Skip to content

Food comparison · IFCT 2017

Hilsa vs Rohu: nutrition per 100 g

Hilsa is the rich fish and rohu the lean one. Per 100 g raw, IFCT 2017 gives hilsa 259 kcal and 18.5 g of fat against 102 kcal and 2.4 g for rohu. Hilsa's fat brings a large dose of omega-3: 925 mg of EPA and 232 mg of DHA, against 24 mg and 47 mg. Protein is close, 21.8 g and 19.7 g.

01Side by side

Hilsa and Rohu, nutrient by nutrient

Every nutrient IFCT 2017 reports for both, per 100 g of the edible portion. The last column names the side with more of it, which is not always the better side: more sodium or saturated fat is not an advantage.

Hilsa vs Rohu per 100 g
NutrientHilsaRohuMore in
Energy and macronutrients
Energy259 kcal102 kcalHilsa
Protein21.8 g19.7 gHilsa
Carbohydrate (available)0 g0 gSame
Dietary fibre0 g0 gSame
Total fat18.5 g2.4 gHilsa
Water60.1 g76.3 gRohu
Fats
Saturated fat9.29 g2.05 gHilsa
Monounsaturated fat6.02 g2.62 gHilsa
Polyunsaturated fat1.8 g0.75 gHilsa
Omega-3 (EPA)925 mg24 mgHilsa
Omega-3 (DHA)232 mg47 mgHilsa
Cholesterol82 mg48 mgHilsa
Minerals
Calcium20 mg39 mgRohu
Iron1.19 mg1.04 mgHilsa
Zinc0.64 mg0.8 mgRohu
Magnesium31 mg27 mgHilsa
Phosphorus278 mg200 mgHilsa
Potassium341 mg303 mgHilsa
Sodium81 mg36 mgHilsa
Copper0.15 mg0.05 mgHilsa
Selenium37.6 µg51.5 µgRohu
Vitamins
Retinol7 µg4 µgHilsa
Riboflavin (B2)0.04 mg0.04 mgSame
Niacin (B3)2.85 mg2.33 mgHilsa
Vitamin B60.12 mg0.24 mgRohu
Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol)1.35 mg2.4 mgRohu

Values per 100 g of the edible portion. Source: Longvah T, Ananthan R, Bhaskarachary K, Venkaiah K. Indian Food Composition Tables 2017. National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad.

Cite this page

NNWA Nutrition and Wellness Academy. Hilsa vs Rohu: nutrition per 100 g. Data: Indian Food Composition Tables 2017, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition. https://nnwa.in/foods/compare/hilsa-vs-rohu/

02Compared

Energy and fat: very different fish

Hilsa (ilish) is the most energy-dense fish in IFCT 2017, ranking 1st of 41 fish and seafood for both energy and fat. Per 100 g raw it has 259 kcal and 18.5 g of fat, about 2.5 times the energy and 7.7 times the fat of rohu, which has 102 kcal and 2.4 g. That richness is what gives hilsa its melting texture and the oily, mustard-laced gravy Bengal loves. Rohu is a lean, everyday river carp. Hilsa also holds less water, 60.1 g per 100 g against 76.3 g in rohu.

03Compared

Omega-3 and the kind of fat

Hilsa's fat carries a remarkable amount of EPA, 925 mg per 100 g, about 38.5 times the 24 mg in rohu, plus 232 mg of DHA against 47 mg. These long-chain omega-3 fats support heart rhythm, the brain and the eyes. Hilsa is also high in saturated fat, 9.29 g per 100 g against 2.05 g in rohu, and in cholesterol, 82 mg against 48 mg, so it is a rich food to enjoy in sensible portions rather than daily in large amounts.

04Compared

Protein, minerals and vitamins

Protein is close: hilsa has 21.8 g per 100 g, ranking 18th of 257 foods, and rohu 19.7 g. Each covers more than a third of a man's daily need. Hilsa has more phosphorus, 278 mg against 200 mg, more potassium and a little more iron, 1.19 mg against 1.04 mg. Rohu has more calcium, 39 mg against 20 mg, more selenium, 51.5 micrograms against 37.6, and slightly more zinc.

Rohu has more vitamin E, 2.4 mg against 1.35 mg, ranking 18th of 242 foods, and hilsa a little more niacin, 2.85 mg against 2.33 mg. Hilsa has more sodium, 81 mg against 36 mg. Rohu also has twice the vitamin B6, 0.24 mg per 100 g against 0.12 mg in hilsa.

05Compared

Shorshe ilish and rui kalia

Hilsa swims upriver from the sea to spawn, and the monsoon catch from the Ganga, Padma and the Bay of Bengal is a seasonal event in Bengal, Odisha and Assam. It becomes shorshe ilish in mustard sauce, ilish bhapa steamed in banana leaf, and ilish paturi. Gujarat knows it as palla. Rohu is the year-round fish of rui macher kalia and macher jhol. Hilsa is costly and very bony; rohu is affordable and easier to eat. Values are for raw flesh.

06The verdict

Which one, for what

For omega-3, especially EPA, hilsa is outstanding, so a seasonal hilsa meal is a good way to get these fats. For weight loss, rohu is the far better everyday fish, with less than half the energy. For muscle, both give similar protein. For heart-conscious diets, hilsa's omega-3 is a plus but its saturated fat and cholesterol call for moderate portions; anyone with heart disease should ask their doctor. On budget, rohu wins easily. For taste and tradition, hilsa in the monsoon and rohu the rest of the year is how Bengal already eats.

Food composition is general information, not a diet plan. Anyone managing a medical condition should plan their diet with a doctor or a registered dietitian.

07Questions

What people ask about hilsa vs rohu

Is hilsa fish healthy?

Hilsa is a rich source of omega-3, with 925 mg of EPA and 232 mg of DHA per 100 g raw, and 21.8 g of protein. It is also high in energy, 259 kcal, and saturated fat, 9.29 g per 100 g. It suits a balanced diet in moderate portions.

Which has more omega-3, hilsa or rohu?

Hilsa, by far. IFCT 2017 lists 925 mg of EPA per 100 g of hilsa against 24 mg in rohu, and 232 mg of DHA against 47 mg. Rohu is a lean fish with modest omega-3.

Is hilsa good for weight loss?

Hilsa is the most energy-dense fish in IFCT 2017, at 259 kcal per 100 g raw. A small piece fits a weight-loss diet, but rohu, at 102 kcal per 100 g, is the better everyday choice for anyone cutting calories.

Why does hilsa have so many bones?

Hilsa belongs to the herring family, which has many fine intermuscular bones. Bengali cooks cut it into thin steaks and eat it slowly, and some recipes slow-cook it until the small bones soften. Children need help picking bones out.

Enquire on WhatsAppOnline now · we reply 24x7Register
Online now · we reply 24x7